Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:53
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Voluptates qui qui deleniti laborum et sed corrupti.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
4 'Healthy' Trends That Need to Stop Now, According to a Dietitian - EatingWell
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Knicks-Pacers: 5 takeaways as Indiana eliminates New York, advances to 2025 Finals - NBA
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Scale of how chronic fatigue syndrome affects patients' blood shown for first time - Medical Xpress
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Could Mauricio Pochettino leave USMNT for Tottenham?: 'It's not realistic' - FOX Sports
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump airs frustrations with Xi and Jerome Powell over elusive economic goals - NBC News